METRICA SEC

Reference number: 40966
Partner username : S4G7QXN9DL
Partner password : JLXMWDV86XZGEBP --> METRICASEC07

IN ORDER TO USE THEM, YOU CAN CONNECT DIRECTLY TO: https://www.epss-fp7.org

Coordination Action proposal Theme 4: ICT and Theme 10: Security Joint Call FP7-ICT-SEC-2007-1

Recommendations to measure and improve the level of protection

of critical infrastructures.

Proposal acronym: METRICASEC07

Type of funding scheme: Coordination action (CA)

Work programme topics addressed:

(if more than one, indicate their order of importance to the project)

ICT-SEC-200 -1.0-02 Modelling and simulation for training

Consortium details

Name of the coordinating person:

Manel Medina

List of participants:

Participant no.

Participant organisation name

Participant short name

Country

1 (Coordinator)

 

UPC or
tb-security
(to be decided)

ESP

2

 

TELEFONICA

ESP

3

 

ISDEFE

ESP

4

 

SYSGENIC

ROM

5

 

EFPC

GBR

6

 

MUFICATA

ESP

7

 

UPM

ESP

8

 

 

 

9

 

VESZPROG

HUN

10

IGD Security

IGD

BGR

11

 

ACROS

SLV

12

 

ITRUST

LUX

13

 

?

FRA

14

 

?

GER

15

 

?

GRC

16

 

?

POL

17

 

?

FIN/SWE/NOR

18

 

?

LIT/EST/LAV

19

 

?

ISR

20

 

?

PRT


1 UPC medina@ac.upc.edu consen@consen.org

2 Telefónica benjamin.martingarcia@telefonica.es noelia.pedreiragarcia@telefonica.es juancarlos.gomezcastillo@telefonica.es

3 isdefe dfvazquez@isdefe.es

4 Sysgenic dumitru.radoiu@sysgenic.com

5 EFPC michael@efpconsulting.com

6 MUFICATA consen@consen.org

7 UPM jmanas@dit.upm.es

8

9 VESZPROG fleitold@veszprog.hu

10 IGD Security drago@unidentity.com

11 ACROS segurity


ICT Theme:ICT-SEC-200 .1.: Technology building blocks for creating, monitoring and managing secure,resilient and always available information infrastructures that link critical infrastructures See also the chance to opt to a Collaborative Project in the Topic: Security

Theme:ICT-SEC-200 -1.0-02 Modelling and simulation for training

AbsABSTRACT

Creation of a WG to reach an agreement about the metrics to be used to evaluate the IT security achieved by industry,enterprises and public administrations.

Define the model to evaluate the security of critical infrastructures, according to its security policy and the metrics indicators selected for each selected sector. The project will address specially the Telecommunications critical infrastructures, with in-depth case studies.

The project will also propose training material to teach relevant actors in the definition, adoption and implementation of security policies of critical infrastructures, making special focus on the impact of the security policy items on the metrics indicators, and simulating the results of the changes according to the adopted metrics.



ObjObjectives

Organisation of collaborative environment to collect contributions and initiatives raised in Europe to promote the application of IT Security measures. Identification of suitable indicators of the success of these initiatives,through commonly agreed metrics.

Production of recommendations to EU Member States to launch most suitable successful initiatives in their countries,according to metrics collected in previous successful experiences in other countries.

The proposal will be launched as a Collaborative and Supportive action,with a budget of 500K€ to share amongst all the partners.



LeaLeadership

So far,leadership is hold by tb-security,but since it is a SME,maybe we should encourage a larger organisation to act as such.Manel Medina could participate also as esCERT-UPC,and use this “independent ” head,representing an organisation with 12 years disseminating security and evaluating security advises to lead the proposal.

Telefonica and Isdefe have already declined the leadership.Nevertheless

Telefonica will check if one of its daughter Companies coud take this role.

Rati

EU vision on security


Security is one particular global challenge that has recently come to the fore due to world events and societal changes. Europe needs to invest in a security culture that harnesses the combined and relatively untapped strengths of the security industry and the research community in order to effectively and innovatively address existing and future security challenges.”


EU Council 12-13/12/2003 approved the «EU Security Strategy» proposed by the Secretary General/High representative (Mr. J. Solana), which focuses towards the following Strategic objectives:

Addressing Threats (terrorism, regional conflicts, organised crime)

Building security in our neighbourhood (consistent high level of security established across its enlarged and more diverse territory)

An international order based on effective multilateralism (no single European country will be able to tackle present or future security problems on its own)


Towards a culture of security


  1. ?Effective security policies should be based on well developed risk assessment methodsin both public and private sectors, but presently there is no common practice for their efficient application;

  2. ?If requirements for the securityguarantee to be built into goods and serviceswere to differsubstantially from one Member State to another, they could ultimately lead to obstacles to free trade across the EU.


Key Principles:


  1. Social

  2. Individual users need to understand that their home systems are critical for the overall security chain

  3. Legal

  4. Privacy and security are a prerequisite for guaranteeing fundamental rights on-line


Public Administrationsto address the security of their own networks and serve as an example of best practicefor other players

Private sector enterprisesto address NIS as an asset and an element of competitive advantagean not as a negativecost

Individual usersto understand that their home systems are criticalfor the overall security chain

Security Governance

  • Adopt best practices in term of security management system (ISO 27001, NIST 800 series)to develop, sustain and improve security processes

  • Risk analysis and management using an home-made methodology using best of breed (EBIOS, ISO 13335, BS 7799-3, CRAMM, MEHARI)?

  • ecurity Controls from best standards (ISO 17799:2000, NIST 800-53, IT BPM (German BSI, COBIT, ISF …)

  • Alignment of business risks (identified through BIA) and controls by developing security baselines based on information systems classification (C,I,A)





Work Package


WP no WP title WP leader


WP

Title

Leader

periode

WP1

Study Awareness of current situation in EU

UPM

m1-m3





WP2

Sectorial Metrics Goals and Approaches


m2-m12

WP3

Dissemination: Best Practices repository and forum



WP5

Recommendations of training strategies



WP4

Conclusions and closing event

MUFICATA

m1-m18

WP5

Project Management and Coordination

UPC

m1-m18


Awareness of current situation in EU

Approach

Research of on-going work in this field in EU.

Identification of relevant standards and good practices recommendations:

-ISO 2 004,Telefonica has already contributed to this standard with some indicators,but they have been kept just as examples

-NIST,has recommended some benchmarking indicators,but they may change depending on the goals of the benchmark,maybe we should concentrate in some of them

Tasks:

T1.1: liaise with current standardisation bodies and critical infrastructures security teams: CSIRT, (CERT), abuse forum, ISMS forum, etc. working on these issues.

T1.2: Identify national government initiatives to promote IS security, as well as multi-national companies programmes.

T1.3: Organisation of a Workshop

Deliverable

Organization of a workshop to set up a common understanding of the current situation



Sectorial Metric goals and approaches

Approach

Production of a set of security indicators,rating them according to the intended interest of security parameter to measure and the population to which it is addressed.

This work will be done through ad-hoc working groups,each of them focused in a particular application scenario.They will identify the needs of each scenario and indicate the level of suitability of the general indicators for each of them. The project will address the identification of indicators to measure the following topics:

-User awareness level

-Risk Analysis results and deepness

-Anti-Malware update policy:frequency and wideness

-Network protection tools:use,update policy,etc.

-Legislation and regulation compliance strategy

-Business Resilience and Continuity protection plans

Tasks

There will be one task per sector:

  • Telecommunications

  • Aerospace

  • Healthcare

  • Government

Deliverable

  • Production of a good practices guidelines report. The report will provide tools to identify the largest number of security breaches, and it will also propose countermeasures to fix them.

  • The good practices will be classified according to the application scenario to which they are addressed.



Dissemination: Best practices dissemination and Forum

Liaison with standardisation bodies:

  • CEN

  • ISO

  • National bodies

Creation and maintenance of web-portal and Forums

Production of communications to events and magazines

Recommendations of training strategies

Tasks:

  • Organisation of training events addressed to relevant actors in the definition, adoption and implementation of security policies of critical infrastructures, making special focus on the impact of the security policy items on the metrics indicators.

  • Specification of tools to measure the relevant security metrics indicators in the selected sectors.

  • Simulate the impact of the changes on the security policies after the training events in the infrastructures managed by the attendees of the courses.

Conclusions and closing event

Tasks:

  • Organisation of a closing event to introduce project results: Sectorial best practices recommendations to measure and improve the level of protection of critical infrastructures.

  • Compile the conclusions of the event and incorporate the relevant contributions to the report (disposition of comments).

  • Publish the project report.


1